| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 5 post(s) |
admiral root
Red Galaxy
Disband.
761
   |
Posted - 2014.02.03 15:03:00 -
[1] - Quote
Bartholomew Templaris wrote:Personally if you eliminated PVP from .6 and higher space, I would have no complaints
So you'd be fine with removing mining, mission running, exploration, manufacturing, research and markets from those systems? What would really be the point in keeping the space in that case?
No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff |
admiral root
Red Galaxy
Disband.
761
|
Posted - 2014.02.03 16:50:00 -
[2] - Quote
Flaming Forum Spammer wrote:CCP does need to figure out something. suiciders (and bumper bullies) telling players to **** off and leave eve or go to 0.0 to avoid being harassed is a ****** solution.
This old chestnut, again? If you see someone harassing or bullying by CCP's definition, which is the only definition that matters in relation to Eve, petition them and CCP will take appropriate action.
No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff |
admiral root
Red Galaxy
Disband.
761
|
Posted - 2014.02.03 16:53:00 -
[3] - Quote
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:This whole concept of you trying to "prove" that null sec sucks compared to high sec, is a joke.
CCP can look at their own internal logs and databases and see what the truth is.
And if a hundred devs posted to say that those internal logs and databases show that the facts back up what Goons and other nullsec residents are saying, you'll move the goalposts and declare a massive, vindictive personal attack on you by CCP and the nulluminati.
Dinsdale tears, fofofo!
No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff |
admiral root
Red Galaxy
Disband.
765
|
Posted - 2014.02.03 18:48:00 -
[4] - Quote
Mallak Azaria wrote:Do you have any evidence to back up these assumptions on what we want?
Who needs evidence when you have an irrational, seething hatred for winners?
No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff |
admiral root
Red Galaxy
Disband.
765
|
Posted - 2014.02.03 18:51:00 -
[5] - Quote
Notorious Fellon wrote:No, anoms are not "in place of" anything. There are anoms in all areas of EVE. Compare those. If you were asking for level 6 missions I doubt you would hear so much resistance. But asking for a nerf based on a ridiculous comparison won't get you much support.
Are you suggesting there are sanctums, havens and forsaken hubs in highsec? Are you suggesting that there are anoms in highsecc that even remotely compare to them? I didn't think so.
Combat level 4 missions are generally battleship-heavy, as are the anoms I mentioned. They might not be exactly equal, but as someone who's extensively done both they're reasonably similar in terms of content and difficulty.
No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff |
admiral root
Red Galaxy
Disband.
765
|
Posted - 2014.02.03 19:03:00 -
[6] - Quote
Josef Djugashvilis wrote:Sorry, just could not resist laughing at your ego 
Where's the ego in the post you quoted?
No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff |
admiral root
Red Galaxy
Disband.
766
|
Posted - 2014.02.03 19:10:00 -
[7] - Quote
Josef Djugashvilis wrote:admiral root wrote:Josef Djugashvilis wrote:Sorry, just could not resist laughing at your ego Where's the ego in the post you quoted? The, 'I am a scientist', bit, It is totally irrelevant.
Is "Irrelevant" in any way a synonym for "egotistical"?
No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff |
admiral root
Red Galaxy
Disband.
769
|
Posted - 2014.02.03 19:29:00 -
[8] - Quote
Josef Djugashvilis wrote:Lordy -easy version for you dear sir, he stated that he was a scientist, to try to give weight/gravitas to his opinions.
Well, maybe he said it because it's true. I don't know and neither do you, but he doesn't post like an un-educated muppet.
Notorious Fellon wrote:admiral root wrote:Notorious Fellon wrote:No, anoms are not "in place of" anything. There are anoms in all areas of EVE. Compare those. If you were asking for level 6 missions I doubt you would hear so much resistance. But asking for a nerf based on a ridiculous comparison won't get you much support. Are you suggesting there are sanctums, havens and forsaken hubs in highsec? Are you suggesting that there are anoms in highsecc that even remotely compare to them? I didn't think so. Combat level 4 missions are generally battleship-heavy, as are the anoms I mentioned. They might not be exactly equal, but as someone who's extensively done both they're reasonably similar in terms of content and difficulty. No, I am not claiming there are Sanctums in hisec. No clue where you got that idea. I am claiming that anoms in null are not comparable to missions in hisec inside a little box that ignores all other income sources. It simply does not matter. Either compare equal activities, or compare the *complete* income streams. No cherry picking.
They are fairly comparable. There's no exact comparison.
No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff |
admiral root
Red Galaxy
Disband.
769
|
Posted - 2014.02.03 19:34:00 -
[9] - Quote
Hell Ball wrote:baltec1 wrote:
Faction drops are rare, hence why they are so expensive, they will not happen enough to make any difference.
.
..............But they still happen tho...............
And plenty of those faction drops are tags and ammo, worth pennies. The last module I had drop was a 20 mil DG cloak.
No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff |
admiral root
Red Galaxy
Disband.
770
|
Posted - 2014.02.03 19:55:00 -
[10] - Quote
Mr Epeen wrote:See, it's not about you and your bad luck. It's about the average of everyone that runs these things. Not everyone is as sadly lacking of good drops as you are.
Ok, tell us about your faction drops in nullsec. The more the merrier (and the more accurate).
No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff |
admiral root
Red Galaxy
Disband.
775
|
Posted - 2014.02.05 14:53:00 -
[11] - Quote
Kagura Nikon wrote: If you make the missions take logner than the payout per mission will automatically increase...
Does not compute.
No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff |
admiral root
Red Galaxy
Disband.
779
|
Posted - 2014.02.07 03:03:00 -
[12] - Quote
Basil Pupkin wrote:a) Which is why freighters aren't a primary gank target. RISK 0,5%, unacceptable to a ganker.
Miniluv would like a word with you.
No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff |
admiral root
Red Galaxy
Disband.
780
|
Posted - 2014.02.07 14:51:00 -
[13] - Quote
E-2C Hawkeye wrote:Tell me how they can sit here and from one side of their mouth say yea pay me billions to come rent null-sec from me and all the while be trying to convience the comunity and CCP that hi-sec makes to much isk?
You're comparing rent payments, which are a transfer of existing isk from one party to another, with isk faucets, which are fresh isk being injected into the game. That's like comparing volts to bananas.
No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff |
admiral root
Red Galaxy
Disband.
784
|
Posted - 2014.02.08 17:22:00 -
[14] - Quote
Pinky, please could you answer the following question: what does sov null have in place of highsec L4 missions?
Thanks!
No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff |
admiral root
Red Galaxy
Disband.
785
|
Posted - 2014.02.08 18:26:00 -
[15] - Quote
E-2C Hawkeye wrote:And here in resides the problem for you tipia and your forum troll buddies like jenna whine la nariz and a host of others. For you guys its about winning internet forum arguments and not about improving the game.
Do you have anything to back this up, or is it just a smokescreen because you don't have actual facts or data to counter what's been said?
No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff |
admiral root
Red Galaxy
Disband.
785
|
Posted - 2014.02.08 18:39:00 -
[16] - Quote
E-2C Hawkeye wrote:Even when given specific and precise information the forum trolls choose to ignore it so they may continue to try and win their argument.
Can you point to a post in this thread with some of this "specific and precise" information, please?
No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff |
admiral root
Red Galaxy
Disband.
785
|
Posted - 2014.02.08 18:44:00 -
[17] - Quote
Pinky Hops wrote:Kimmi Chan wrote:Again what is being claimed is that NullSec Combat PVE (Anoms) vs. HighSec Combat PVE (L4 Missions) is out of balance in terms of risk : reward.
To answer that, see if you can answer this question: what does sov null have in place of highsec L4 missions?
No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff |
admiral root
Red Galaxy
Disband.
786
|
Posted - 2014.02.08 19:01:00 -
[18] - Quote
Mr Epeen wrote:What they are really arguing for is forcing high sec carebears into easy ganks in low/null.
Who, specifically, is trying to force anyone to leave highsec?
No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff |
admiral root
Red Galaxy
Disband.
790
|
Posted - 2014.02.08 19:43:00 -
[19] - Quote
Pinky Hops wrote:Kimmi Chan wrote:So by that logic we would also include trading in all the empire market hubs as part of that income. In which case there is still an imbalance overall. If you see it as an "imbalance" that people trade in Jita, I'm not sure what to tell you. At this point I think you have lost your grips on the term "balance."
That's not what he said.
No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff |
| |
|